Audio Graphic Equalizer

[jofemodo]

@riban

He he - I knew that odd use of separate Fluidsynth outputs would bite you!!!

Ahhhahaha! I was waiting for it too!!

@riban

I personally think the use of this feature to be overkill and that we don’t benefit significantly but I’m not the boss and @jofemodo often knows better

I totally agree with you, but removing the internal effects from Fluidsynth is quite disruptive and i’m afraid that could be annoying for some users. Perhaps we could ask the community, explaining the advantages and disadvantages.

I will create a new post for this …

Proposal: Removing internal FXs from FluidSynth

We (@riban and @jofemodo) are thinking of removing the internal FXs from fluidsynth. We have good reasons for doing this: The fluidsynth implementation doesn’t fit our needs, as we are forced to spawn FXs processes for every channel (16 reverbs + 16 choruses = 32 processes), wasting resources . OK, that is not totally true, as we only spawn 8 reverbs + 8 choruses, so some channels share reverb and chorus (1 & 9, 2 & 10, etc.), what reduces the CPU load, but it adds complexity and it’s diffic…

Cheers!